| Bonny's profileBeePhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
February 24 The Tories start shredding the country... againThe Tories have started to, in Margaret Atwood's words, shred the country -- again. And what better place to start than killing funding for government subsidized daycare?
Harper thinks he's got a simple, good idea -- $1,200 per year per offspring under the age of 6. Money in one's pocket has got to be a good thing, right? Not necessarily.
$1,200 per year per offspring for families who are well-off enough to have one parent (usually the mother) stay home with the offspring(s) is nice. It may go towards such worthy goods such as organic baby food, extra cushy strollers with big wheels, and designer children's clothes. The odd (very odd) bleeding-heart goody-goody couple may decide to give their live-in nanny from the Philippines a modest raise.
$1,200 per year per offspring for families of typical middle class existence (or below) combined with no or reduced access to government subsidized daycare space is zero help when it costs up to $800 per month to place a child in private daycare (http://www.childcareontario.org/library/ONchildcarestats2005.pdf; http://www.moneysense.ca/spending/credit_debt/article.jsp?content=20040423_142424_4924).
And why $1,200? Where does that number come from? I'd like to know.
So the Tories think they have a mandate (see below) to kill funding for government subsidized daycare. So according to them, they also think they have a mandate to:
* join the stupid War in Iraq (it's never too late!)
* strip gay and lesbian couples of the right to marry
* pretty much anything that the Tories said that they'd like to do
And these clowns have only got a minority government by the slimest of margins!
This is only the beginning.
February 22 VictimsI am suspicious of people who take on the role of victim too readily. Such individuals (a) refuse to accept any responsibility whatsoever for whatever misfortunes that have befallen them and (b) use their misfortunes to justify their own bad behaviour and subsequent failure in life.
Think of Steve Moore. The fact that two years later he's still crying like a baby telling his story to anyone who has nothing better to do than listen to him indicates that he is still in full victim mode. His lawyer said Moore still felt the effects of the concussion. Poor Stevie. But consider this: if your focus in life for two years is to tell everyone how you've been screwed and how sorry they should be for you because you're now lame and useless, it is not surprising that you *are* lame and useless.
I am not saying that Moore had not suffered, or that he is not deserving of some compensation for what has been done to him (although certainly not $15 million, not even 10% of that). My point is that: one can never recover until one moves on. The obsession with revenge and garnering public sympathy stands in the way of any chance of turning over a page and starting anew. |
|
|